Provided by the NOAA Arctic Research Office
Intro | Leg1 | Leg2 | Cruise Report | Station Log | Photos

RUSCALA

A Census of Arctic Zooplankton Communities

Russell R. Hopcroft, Institute of Marine Science, University of Alaska Fairbanks

Ksenia Kosobokova, PP Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences

 

Ksenia Kosobokova,
Photo: B. Holladay

 

Our knowledge of abundance, composition and distribution of zooplankton communities in the Arctic Ocean is poor compared to most other northern regions. The Chukchi Sea represents a key oceanographic gateway into the Arctic, but our ability to understand its complex dynamics have been hampered by the political border that has prevented critically needed synoptic surveys.  We have undertaken a comprehensive survey and census of zooplankton species in the Bering Strait through central Chukchi Sea at 33 stations to understand the transport patterns of Pacific zooplankton into the Arctic and serve as a baseline for future studies on ecosystem change in this climatically sensitive region.

 

The census has been conducted using plankton nets of 150 and 53 µm mesh with analysis to involve a combination of traditional taxonomic enumeration and identification, along with comprehensive molecular sequencing to be undertaken by Ann Bucklin (University of New Hampshire).  Photographic documentation has been completed for a number the species encountered.  To determine why zooplankton biomass remains low despite the incredibly high primary production in much of this region, egg production experiments have been conducted at 22 stations with several of the dominant copepod species in this region (i.e. primarily Pseudocalanus spp., with variable contributions by Metridia pacifica, Eucalanus bungii, and Calanus marshallae).  These rates are expected to be very sensitive to modification by climate change.

 

Ksenia Kosobokova and Russ Hopcroft. Photo: K. Crane

The differences in zooplankton communities encountered on the transect lines has been striking, with communities on the eastern side having an “estuarine” community structure characteristic of Alaska Coastal water (i.e. Acartia longiremis, Eurytemora affinis, Centropages abdominalis, Pseudocalanus spp., Podon leuckarti, Evadne nordmanni).  Moving westward, communities characteristic of Bering shelf water, with large population of the larvacean Oikopleura vanhoeffeni, and overwhelming numbers of barnacle nauplii and cyriped larvae were found suspended in a soup of phytoplankton. Along the Russian coastline, phytoplankton biomass remained high, and zooplankton again shifted toward more coastal forms, but differed in the relative composition of species as compared to the Alaska coast.  On the more northern transects, a pronounced change in community composition was also evident, with communities on the western and central waters very similar to the Bering Shelf communities encountered to the south, while water on the eastern side was lower in phytoplankton and zooplankton and had a more coastal character.  Egg production experiments were conducted most consistently with Pseudocalanus species, and they suggest that reproduction occurs throughout the region but is significantly enhanced in Bering shelf waters compared to coastal waters. A fuller characterization of the communities and their reproductive rates will require more detailed analysis of the samples.   

 

This work will represent an extension of work begun in the Canada Basin under the Ocean Exploration Office, provide geographic coverage of the zooplankton community to compliment the concurrent Shelf-Basin Interactions program, and ties into the Arctic Ocean Biodiversity project by the Census of Marine Life. All of these efforts share common methods that will allow for the first comprehensive broad-scale mapping of zooplankton communities and processes throughout the Western Arctic Ocean. 


 


 

Lat.

Long.

Date

Time

Depth

Egg Production experiments

Sta#

Nome

Nome

 

(local)

 

 

6

65.688

191.822

August 10, 2004

8:00

49

Ps

7

65.779

191.415

August 10, 2004

14:00

52

 

8

65.873

190.892

August 10, 2004

16:00

45

Ps, Eu

9

65.943

190.52

August 11, 2004

2:00

53

 

10

65.995

190.368

August 11, 2004

4:00

54

Ps

11

66.934

189.009

August 11, 2004

16:45

53

Ps

12

67.175

189.703

August 12, 2004

0:30

48

 

13

67.432

190.367

August 12, 2004

4:20

51

Ps

14

67.636

190.98

August 12, 2004

12:30

53

 

15

67.881

191.686

August 12, 2004

18:50

59

attempted, too few for expt

16

68.127

192.373

August 13, 2004

8:00

ABORTED

 

17

68.304

192.954

August 13, 2004

10:45

39

Ps

18

68.95

193.09

August 13, 2004

22:15

48

Ps

19

69.03

192.11

August 14, 2004

7:50

51

 

20

69

191.14

August 14, 2004

9:45

54

Ps

21

68.88

190.4

August 14, 2004

18:45

57

 

22

68.74

189.58

August 14, 2004

20:50

57

 

23

68.52

188.54

August 15, 2004

3:00

56

Ps,Mp,Cm

24

68.34

187.66

August 15, 2004

12:50

53

 

25

67.87

187.15

August 15, 2004

19:45

49

Ps

26

67.67

186.81

August 16, 2004

2:20

49

 

27

67.39

186.33

August 16, 2004

6:00

31

attempted, too few for expt

106

70.74

184.47

August 18, 2004

10:45

72

Ps

44

70.984

184.0234

August 18, 2004

21:45

56

Ps,Cm

49

70.871

184.8915

August 19, 2004

3:15

71

 

57

70.92

185.98034

August 19, 2004

9:00

44

 

58

71.404

185.64517

August 19, 2004

12:30

55

Ps

66

71.387

184.51884

August 19, 2004

18:00

36

Ps

67

71.752

183.78783

August 19, 2004

22:00

42

Ps, Cm

74

71.924

184.633

August 20, 2004

3:05

73

 

79

72.047

185.24134

August 20, 2004

6:50

61

Ps

80

72.347

184.74984

August 20, 2004

9:00

51

Ps

85

72.316

184.01634

August 20, 2004

14:00

103.5

Ps

89

72.284

183.284

August 20, 2004

18:00

74

Ps

             73B

71.9

184.51183

August 21, 2004

5:00

hand only

Ps

 62B

71.395

185.08183

August 21, 2004

17:40

76.5

Ps

107

70.889

187.324

August 21, 2004

3:50

40

 

             

 


Cruise Report: